Anonymous
March 23rd, 2004, 02:01 PM
First off - EXCELLENT PROGRAM!!! :D I've been looking for something (anything!) better than NanoPEG & was just about to go with MPEG-VCR when I found info on VideoReDo on another forum. Intuitive GUI, fast, & the price is right! I'll be purchasing soon.
During my eval of VideoReDo, I've noticed that the size of the output file is smaller than the same edit done in NanoPEG.
A SVCD file edits to 2,554 MEG using NanoPEG, but the same edit in VideoReDo creates a file that is 2,078 MEG. All I do is trim off the beginning & the end. No other cuts inside the video.
What is VideoReDo removing that causes the output file to be almost 500M smaller than the NanoPEG-edited file?
Both files seem to play back properly. VideoReDo does not indicate any errors when creating the output file.
Also, noticed that Windows Media Player shows a time length of 2:05:09 on this file, but stops playing at 2:05:01. VideoReDo says the file is 2:05:01.89. Why the difference in reported time?
Thanks
During my eval of VideoReDo, I've noticed that the size of the output file is smaller than the same edit done in NanoPEG.
A SVCD file edits to 2,554 MEG using NanoPEG, but the same edit in VideoReDo creates a file that is 2,078 MEG. All I do is trim off the beginning & the end. No other cuts inside the video.
What is VideoReDo removing that causes the output file to be almost 500M smaller than the NanoPEG-edited file?
Both files seem to play back properly. VideoReDo does not indicate any errors when creating the output file.
Also, noticed that Windows Media Player shows a time length of 2:05:09 on this file, but stops playing at 2:05:01. VideoReDo says the file is 2:05:01.89. Why the difference in reported time?
Thanks